IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
M.KRISHNAMOORTHY – Appellant
Versus
the Managing Director – Respondent
##PAGE1##
WP No. 1950 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29-01-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
WP No. 1950 of 2026
and
WMP Nos.2043 and 2044 of 2026
M.Krishnamoorthy
S/o.Munusamy,
No.61, Appanu Vattam,
Vaniyambadi, Kethandapatti Village,
Thirupattur District-635 815
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Managing Director
Tirupattur Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd.,
Kethandapatti, Thirupattur District-635 815
2. The Commissioner Sugar Corporation,
No.690, Anna Salai,
Nandanam, Chennai-600 035.
__________
Page1 of 9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/02/2026 12:21:25 pm )
##PAGE2##WP No. 1950 of 2026
..Respondent(s)
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India,
praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the
first respondent herein vide his proceedings Na.Ka. No.Gratuity / Kaa.A/ 2025
dated 06.02.2025 and consequently direct the first respondent to issue the
balance 8 days gratuity with interest to the petitioner.
For Petitioner(s): S.Ezhilraj
For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Selvaraj for R1
Additional Government Pleader
Mr.P.Balathandayutham for R2
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of the
first respondent dated 06.02.2025, and consequently, seeking a direction to the
first respondent to disburse the balance gratuity for 8 days, together with
interest, to the petitioner.
2.The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as an NMR (Non-
Muster Roll) employee under the first respondent Sugar Mill and rendered 28
years of continuous service, retiring on superannuation on 31.01.2017. Despite
__________
Page2 of 9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/02/2026 12:21:25 pm )
##PAGE3##WP No. 1950 of 2026
being eligible for gratuity under Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972,
the first respondent calculated gratuity at the rate of 7 days’ wages per year,
instead of 15 days’ wages, which is contrary to statutory provisions and the
binding circulars issued by the Commissioner of Sugar, the 2nd respondent
herein. The 2nd respondent, by Circulars dated 25.07.1990 and 04.12.2009,
categorically directed that seasonal/NMR employees who have completed the
prescribed service are entitled to gratuity at the rate of 15 days’ wages per year,
with strict instructions for timely settlement. Earlier, the petitioner approached
this Court in W.P No.17364 of 2022, wherein this Court, by order dated
08.07.2022, directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s
representation. Though the petitioners submitted representations on 13.06.2023,
10.10.2023 and 24.01.2024, the respondents failed to consider the same. Hence
the petitioner initiated Contempt Petition No.3246 of 2025, wherein this Court
granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging the rejection order dated
06.02.2025. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue
involved in the present writ petition is no longer res integra, as the same has
already been decided by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A Nos.361, 362,
363 and 365 of 2024 and batch cases. Accordingly, he prayed to allow this writ
petition.
__________
Page3 of 9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/02/2026 12:21:25 pm )
##PAGE4##WP No. 1950 of 2026
4.Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for
the first respondent would submit though the present issue is covered by the
order of the Division Bench of this court, this Court may grant liberty to the
respondents to disburse the amount, subject to verification as to whether any
appeal is pending against the order of the Division Bench of this Court.
5.In response to the submissions made by the learned Additional
Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent, the learned counsel for
the petitioner would submit that the order of the Division Bench has attained
finality and that no appeal has been filed. Accordingly, he prayed for
appropriate orders.
6.Heard the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.