IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
M/s. GRM Constructions – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Ganga Associates – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Crl.O.P.No.1590 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.1590 of 2026
M/s. GRM Constructions
Rep. by its Power Agent,
Mr.P.Ganesh Kumar (32 Years),
No.6/A, Salem Road,
Kalangani,
Namakkal - 637 014. ...Petitioner
Vs.
M/s. Ganga Associates
Rep.by its Proprietor,
Mr.S.Rajagopal,
S/o. Subramanian,
Having office at
No.143/40, Second Cross,
Ponnagar,
Tiruchirappalli - 620 001. ...Respondent
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the docket order
dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at
Namakkal and consequentially issue a direction to the learned Judicial
Magistrate No.II,Namakkal to number and take cognizance of the case in
STC.No. (Filing Number) 2954 of 2024 .
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Parthasarathy
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/02/2026 03:45:06 pm )
##PAGE2##Crl.O.P.No.1590 of 2026
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to set aside
the docket order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate
No.II, Namakkal, returning the criminal complaint on the point of lack of
territorial jurisdiction and consequently to direct the learned Magistrate to
number the complaint and take cognizance of the same in STC.No. (Filing
Number) 2954 of 2024.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent / accused
issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.10,88,660/- bearing cheque No.000043,
drawn on HDFC Bank, Kangeyam Road, Chennimalai, Erode. The said
cheque was presented by the petitioner for collection on 22.01.2024 through
Axis Bank, Gandhipuram Branch, Coimbatore. The cheque was returned on
23.01.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a complaint before the Judicial
Magistrate No.I, Namakkal on 21.03.2024. The learned Judicial Magistrate
returned the complaint for want of territorial jurisdiction. Subsequently, the
petitioner filed a memo and re-presented the complaint on 26.06.2025.
Whereas, the learned Magistrate, vide docket order dated 01.07.2025 once
again returned the complaint with the following endorsement:
“No Territorial Jurisdiction.
On the point of jurisdiction this petition to be file proper
2/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/02/2026 03:45:06 pm )
##PAGE3##Crl.O.P.No.1590 of 2026
form.
Hence returned”
Challenging the said docket order dated 01.07.2025, this petition has been
filed.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that
though the cheque was presented for collection through Axis Bank,
Gandhipuram Branch, Coimbatore, the petitioner maintains his account with
Axis Bank, Bothupatti Branch, Namakkal, which falls within the territorial
jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Namakkal. He would further
submit that as per the mandate of Section 142(2)(a) of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881, the complainant being the payee, is entitled to file
the complaint before the Court having jurisdiction over the place where the
bank of the payee is situated. In such circumstances, when the bank of the
petitioner is within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate No.II,
Namakkal, he ought to have taken the complaint on file, whereas, he had
erroneously returned the complaint.
4. Since the impugned order is only a return of the complaint, no
notice to the respondent is required.
3/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/02/2026 03:45:06 pm )
##PAGE4##Crl.O.P.No.1590 of 2026
5. Heard learned counsel on either side and perused the materials
available on record.
6. It is the case of the petitioner that though the cheque in
question was presented for collection through Axis Bank, Gandhipuram
Branch, Coimbatore, the petitioner maintains his bank account with
Bothupatti Branch, Namakkal, within the territorial jurisdiction of the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Namakkal. In this regard, reliance is
placed on the judgment of the Apex Court in Prakash Chimanial Sheth Vs.
Jagruti Keyur Rajpopat r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.