SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 13026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Raja Mohamed – Appellant
Versus
Chairman – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Raja Mohamed ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Chairman, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Office No.1, Jaffar Sirank Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

2.Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, (Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer), Office No.1, Jaffar Sirank Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

3.The Superintendent, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Ramanathapuram, Sivagangai & Virudhunagar Zone, No.176/11, 1st Floor, Tharpasayanam Road, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram – 623 504.

4.The Inspector of Wakf, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Ramanathapuram, Sivagangai & Virudhunagar Zone, No.176/11, 1st Floor, Tharpasayanam Road, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram – 623 504.

5.Kamal Basha

6.Jabarulla

7.A.Buros Khan

8.Mohaideen Abdul Kadar ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.07.2025 within stipulated time prescribed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.A.Syed Shaik Alaudeen For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the first and second respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.07.2025 within a stipulated time prescribed by this Court.

2.With the consent of the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already sent a representation to the respondents 1 & 2 on 17.07.2025 with regard to the alleged grievance of misappropriation of funds by the respondents 5 to 8. Since the said representation remain unconsidered, the petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition.

4.Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be considered by the respondents 1 & 2 in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, by directing the respondents 1 & 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2025, by following the procedure under Section 70 of the Wakf Act and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four [4] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. There shall be no order as to costs.

23.01.2026 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No MR KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

MR

23.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top