IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI K. Ramasamy S/o.Kandasamy, Asst. Manager, TNSTC (Retd), No.44, Ammasai Konar Street, K.K.Pudur, Sai Baba Colony, Coimbatore 641 038.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore.

2. The General Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Coimbatore Division II, Chennimalai Road, Erode-638 001. ..Respondent(s)

The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to Call for the records relating to the order passed in KA.No.30380 / L13 / MCOP / TNSTC / CO/ EM /2025 dated 25/10/2025 and to quash the same and direct the Respondents herein to calculate the entire length of service from the date of appointment till date of superannuation along with eligible increment for the year 2018 -19 and revise pension accordingly to the petitioner.

For Petitioner(s): Mr. D. Anand Raja For Respondent(s): Mr. M. Murali Vinoth

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of the

2^nd respondent dated 25.10.2025 and directing the Respondents herein to calculate the entire length of service from the date of appointment till date of superannuation along with eligible increment for the year 2018 -19 and revise pension accordingly to the petitioner.

2.The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as an ITI (Electrical Cadre) at Erode Rural Branch on 23.01.1989 with the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Coimbatore Division II and joined as duty as trainee on the same day. After joining the duty, the petitioner became a contributor of provident fund in P.F Account No.TN/17219/5144 and subsequently, he was promoted as Junior Engineer with a new pay scale as a new employee. After rendering an unblemished service of 30 years, he had retired on 31.03.2019 as Assistant Manager. After his retirement, the petitioner came to know that he is entitled for annual increment for the year 2018-2019. The petitioner is entitled for terminal benefits from 23.01.1989, whereas the respondent calculated the terminal benefits only from the 11^th month of 1989.

The petitioner made several representations to the respondents, however the same was not considered. Hence the petitioner filed a writ petition in W.P No.30380 of 2025 seeking a direction to the 1^st respondent herein to calculate the entire length of service from the date of appointment till the date of superannuation along with eligible increment for the year 2018-2019 and revision the pension accordingly to the petitioner and the same was allowed on 13.08.2025. However the 1^st respondent failed to consider the petitioner’s case and passed the impugned order on 25.10.2025. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees Pension Fund Trust Rules, regular service is required to be taken into account for pensionary benefits. In the present writ petition, admittedly, the petitioner was appointed as a Trainee in January 1989. However, the pensionary benefits were calculated only from November 1989 to 31.03.2019 which is not sustainable in law. The respondent ought to have calculated the pension benefits from January 1989 to 31.03.2019. Further, the petitioner is entitled to annual increment from 01.10.2018 onwards. However, the said annual increment was not granted which is also not sustainable. Accordingly, he prayed to allow the present writ petition.

4.Per contra, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that admittedly, the petitioner retired from service on 31.03.2019, whereas, he made a representation only in the year 2025, after a lapse of six years. The delay in making the representation has not been properly explained. Further, the peti