SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 77

MADRAS HIGH COURT
WIPRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
HEINZ INDIA PVT LTD – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

The applicant in all these applications is the plaintiff in C.S.No.23 of 2015 and the respondents are the defendants. The said suit has been filed for the following reliefs:-

(a) granting a permanent injunction, restraining the defendants by themselves, their servants, agents, men, or anyone claiming through them from manufacturing, marketing, distributing, offering or advertising for sale any kind of products using the mark VOLT or similar sounding marks in the course of their business and pass of their products using the trademark VOLT as and for products sold under trademark BOLTS of the plaintiff or enable others to pass off.

(b) granting a permanent injunction, restraining the defendants by themselves, their servants, agents, men, or anyone claiming through them from manufacturing, marketing, distributing, offering or advertising for sale any kind of products using the tag line INSTANT ENERGY. ANYTIME. ANYWHERE. or similar sounding lines in the course of their business and pass of their products using the tag line ENERGY OF GLUCON-D. ANYWHERE. ANYTIME as and for products sold under the tag line INSTANT ENERGY. ANYTIME. ANYWHERE. of the plaintiff or enable others to p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top