MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.Vaidyanathan, J
M/s.Amrut Distilleries Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Authorized Officer, Chennai Seaport & Airport – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments centered on correct interpretation of labeling regulations. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Aggrieved by the order, dated 15.10.2014 passed by the first respondent, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition.
2. It seems that the petitoner had imported Active Dry Yeast vide Bill of Entry No.6898217, dated 26.9.2014, which was referred to the first respondent by the Customs Department for compliance under the Act. By the impugned order, dated 15.10.2014, it was informed to the petitoner that one of the food items, viz., Active Dry Yeast, does not meet the labelling requirement under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (in short, the Act, 2006) and hence, the samples could not be drawn. The reason mentioned was that as per the guidelines issued by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (in short, FSSAI), dated 24.1.2013, in wholesale package if 'Best Before Date' and 'Expiry Date'are given, then two should be different and clearly specified, however, as regards the above said food item of the petitioner, both 'Expiry Date'and 'Best Before Date' are mentioned as one and the same, i.e. 2016/04/30.
3. According to the petitioner, a representation wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.