SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 13500

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
N.KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
C.SELLAMUTHU – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and CMP No.726 of 2026

1. N.Krishnan S/o Neliappan, D.No 94, Mengkattu Mettu Theru, Pasupathipalayam Post, Karur Taluk, Karur Dist.

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. C.Sellamuthu S/o Chinnasamy, 4/3, Kunjankattur Thottam, Agilandapuram, Mulanur Post, Respondent(s)

Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur Dist.

Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decreetal order dated 08.10.2025 made in I.A.No.2 of 2023 in O.S.No.32 of 2018 on the file of Subordinate Court, Dharapurm.

For Petitioner(s): M/s.P.Rajagopalan For Respondent(s): M/s.K.V.Muthuvisakan

ORDER

Heard Mr.P.Rajagopalan, learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant and Mr.K,V.Muthuvisakan, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that though the delay is 1722 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree, if the Covid period is calculated and factored, the delay would be much less and further he would also point out to the affidavit filed in support of the petition where the petitioner has stated that his son is a special child and he had to b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top