BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 18.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.CRL.(MD). No.1306 of 2025 MRP Sports and Recreation Club, Rep. by its President, N.Mathan, S/o.P.Natarajan, No.1/492, 1^st Street, Mappillaiyurani, Tuticorin. ... Petitioner Vs

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thalamuthu Nagar, Tuticorin. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the lawful activity of playing “Rummy” (13 cards) without stakes or money by the members of the petitioner club, based on the representation dated 28.04.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Bashyam For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the lawful activity of playing Rummy (13 cards) by the members of the petitioner Club.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is running a recreation club, where their members play rummy without stakes, and that the police are very frequently interfering and harassing them. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Section 3 of the City Police Act, 1888 defines “the Common Gaming House“. Section 45 of City Police Act prescribes the punishment for using a place as a “Common Gaming House“. A reading of both the provisions show that in a place, where game is played on wager or bet, the police have got right to interfere and prosecute the persons, who run the place, under Section 45 of the City Police Act. In this case, the petitioner is running a recreation club for its members, wherein according to the petitioner, game of rummy is played without stakes.

4. However, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), on instructions, submitted that the police are not causing any disturbance to the activities of the petitioner.

5. The submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) is recorded. It is also seen that a Division Bench of this Court in the case of the Director General of Police, State of Tamil Nadu, Mahalakshmi Cultural Association report in 2012(2) CTC 484 has gone into this aspect of recreation club permitting the recreation club to play rummy without stakes and held as follows :

“24. On the basis of the above discussions, we arrive at the following conclusions:

(1) The game of rummy (13 card) is only a game of skill even though an element of chance is also involved.

(2) In the event rummy is played by the members or the guests without stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are not attracted.

(3) In the event rummy is played by the members of the guests with stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are attracted.

(4) In the event the Club/Association either allows its members or gusts to play rummy with stakes or make any profit or gain out of such gambling, the police has the authority to invoke the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act.

(5) In order to ascertain as to whether the premises is used as a gaming house for gambling, the police is entitles to invoke Section 23 of the Act.“

6. In view of the above, this Court directs that (i) the petitioner Club shall not indulge in any activity by allowing its members or the guests to play rummy (13 cards) with stakes and make profit or gain.

(ii) the police are entitled to take action in the event of any illegal activity is carried on in the Club premises.

(iii) the police shall not disturb the petitioner~Club frequently under the guise of inspection without there being any reliable information as to the illegal activities of the Club or its members or the guests.

7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

18.02.2026 (SSYJ)

pal To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin.

2.