SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14084

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Mathew Oommen – Appellant
Versus
P.G.Santhosh Kumar – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :16.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and CMP.No.3844 of 2026

1.Mathew Oommen

2.Phebe Mathe ... Petitioners vs.

1.Dr.P.G.Santhosh Kumar

2.Chitrakala ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 06.08.2025 passed by the III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.238 of 2025.

For Petitioners : Mr.L.Mouli For Respondents :Mr.P.R.Ramesh Babu O R D E R The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the trial Court appointing Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features.

2. The respondents herein filed a suit for bare injunction against the petitioners. Pending the suit, the respondents filed an application seeking appointment of Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features. According to the respondents, there is a disputed pathway on the west of the property purchased by the defendants. The petitioners/defendants denied the very presence of the pathway in the counter filed to the present application. It was categorically averred by the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top