Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14169
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
Ravi Mohan Studios Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Indo Bevs Private Limited – Respondent
O.A.No.972 of 2025 | A.Nos.5717 & 5768 of 2025
Important Points
Settlement agreement leads to dismissal of trademark infringement case without costs.
Subject
Civil - Intellectual Property
Act Referred
Headnote
The plaintiff sought a declaration to confirm that its film title 'BROCODE' does not infringe any trademark rights of the defendants, along with a permanent injunction against threats of infringement. The plaintiff later filed a memo stating a settlement was reached, resulting in the dismissal of the case as settled out of court. The court noted the settlement and closed the applications accordingly.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Vignesh Venkatachalam, Anu Ganesan, M.Rakshita
For the Respondents: M/s.Vadiraj Anirudh.S.G
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Vignesh Venkatachalam, Anu Ganesan, M.Rakshita
For the Respondents: M/s.Vadiraj Anirudh.S.G
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff states settlement was reached. (Para 1) |
| 2. court dismisses case as settled. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff has filed memo dated 24.02.2026 stating that the plaintiff and the second defendant executed settlement agreement dated 16.02.2026, which was recorded by the Delhi High Court in connected proceedings by order dated
17.02.2026. The plaintiff seeks to withdraw the suit in view of such settlement.
2. Accordingly, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.258 of 2025 is dismissed as settled out of Court without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected applications are closed.
