Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ
P.Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority of Urban Land Ceiling and Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of writ appeal against single judge order. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. facts surrounding the ownership and notice issues. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on legal standing. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. concluding remarks affirming the dismissal. (Para 10 , 11) |
(Judgement of the Court was made by C.Kumarappan J.)
The present Writ Appeal is filed assailing the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.12.202015. The appellant and the respondents are the petitioner and respondents respectively before the Writ Court.
2.For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to according to their litigative status before the learned Single Judge.
3.(a).The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of the present Writ Appeal is that, the property bearing SF.Nos.242, 246, 248 and 254 of Thiruneermalai Village comes within the purview of “The Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act” [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”]. Hence, based upon the proceedings under Section 9(5) of the Act, a draft statement was served upon the owners of the vacant land in excess of their ceiling limit. In pursuance thereof, authority took initiative to take possession of vacant land in excess of ceiling
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
