Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Sakthivel, J
N.Nithyanandan – Appellant
Versus
R.Narayanasamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for abandoning rights in joint family properties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for and against appointing an advocate commissioner. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observation on the necessity of an inspection. (Para 12 , 13) |
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , 1950, praying to set aside the Dismissal Order dated January 20, 2022 passed in I.A. No.2 of 2019 in O.S. No.816 of 2019 on the file of 'the V Additional District Judge, Coimbatore' [hereinafter referred to as the 'Trial Court'], by the Petitioner/Plaintiff therein.
2. The Petitioner herein is the Plaintiff and the Respondents herein are the Defendants in the Suit in O.S.No.816 of 2019. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Suit.
3. The 1st Defendant is the father of the Plaintiff. The 2nd Defendant is the Plaintiff's brother.
4. The case of the Plaintiff is that Suit Properties are ancestral and joint family properties in which the Plaintiff is entitled to 1/3 share. Accordingly, he filed a Suit seeking partition and division of properties. Then the Plaintiff filed a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
