Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Remeggious Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
Anne Anshumathi Raj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges family court's maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of income suppression by the respondent. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court reviewed financial disclosures and determined maintenance. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final decision on reasonableness of maintenance upheld. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The civil revision petition is filed by petitioner/husband challenging the order passed by the family court directing him to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.35,000/- per month each to three minor daughters and to pay Rs.50,000/- towards litigation expenses.
2. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised on 30.08.2009 and out of wedlock, three female children were born. The relationship between the petitioner and the respondent got strained. Therefore, the respondent and her children have been living separately from 07.02.2019. The respondent filed original petition under Section 10 (1)(x), 37 and 43 of the Divorce Act, 1869 , seeking divorce from the petitioner. She also sought for permanent custody of the three minor children and permanent alimony of Rs.2 crores. Pending disposal of the OP, she filed IA.No.1 of 2019
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
