Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Senthilkumar, J
K.Kamalakannan – Appellant
Versus
Bhuvaneshwari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of procedural fairness and ex-parte decrees. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. motion to combine related suits. (Para 3) |
| 3. failure to cross-examine leading to dismissal of evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. restoration of the suit to allow cross-examination. (Para 6) |
| 5. final order on the civil revision petition. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This civil revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 14.11.2025 made in I.A.No.02 of 2025 in O.S.No.947 of 2014 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai.
2.Originally the suit in O.S.No.947 of 2014 was filed by the respondent herein for permanent injunction. On 22.07.2025, when the suit was posted for cross examination of PW1, the defendants did not appear and cross examine the PW1. Hence, the defendants are called absent and set ex-parte and ex-parte decree was also passed. To set aside the above said ex-parte decree, the petitioner has filed the present I.A.No. 2 of 2025. The same was dismissed by the trial Court. Against the dismissal order, the present civil revision petition has been filed.
3.The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submits that the revision petitioners filed a suit in O.S.No.387 of 2025 seekin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
