Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.MARIA CLETE, J
M.Govindaraj – Appellant
Versus
S.K.Adam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case including the nature of the property dispute. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding the sufficiency of evidence and proper adjudication. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 3. court's observations on reliance of evidence and the findings of fact. (Para 12 , 15) |
| 4. conclusion stating the dismissal of the appeal. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
Heard.
2. This Second Appeal is by the plaintiff in O.S. No.754 of 2005, challenging the concurrent judgments whereby the suit came to be dismissed by the I Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi on 10.08.2011 and the said dismissal was confirmed by the Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi in A.S. No.95 of 2011 on 11.10.2012.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they were arrayed before the Trial Court.
4. The suit was instituted for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from trespassing into the suit property and from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment, particularly in relation to the portion shown as C D E F in the plaint rough sketch, including the common wall marked E F and the alleged vacant strip of 1 ½ feet adjoining the plaintiff’s construction, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
