SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14301

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
T.D.TAMILARASAN – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN – Respondent



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.G.V.Sridharan
For the Respondents: Mr.Su.Srinivasan, Standing Counsel for R1 and R2, Ms.S.Indhu Bala, Additional Government Pleader for R3

Court mandates timely consideration of land access representation after acquisition under national legislation.

Headnote:The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus directing respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for access to the remaining land after a portion was acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956. The court ordered the third respondent to consider the representation within two months after providing an opportunity to the petitioner. The outcome of the case does not entail costs.

Table of Content
1. access after land acquisition (Para 1 , 4)
2. notice acceptance (Para 2 , 3)
3. consideration of representation mandated (Para 5)

ORDER

After a portion of the petitioner's land was acquired by initiating proceedings under the National Highways Act, 1956, it is stated that the petitioner has been deprived of access to the remaining land in Survey No.303/2B, Vembanoor Village, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. After submitting a representation dated 22.01.2026 in this regard, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2 and Ms.S.Indhu Bala, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the third respondent.

3. Learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the petitioner's representation would be considered and disposed of on merits.

4. The petitioner asserts that the remaining land owned by him abuts the East Coast Road. It is also asserted that as a result of the acquisition, the petitioner does not have any access to his property. This aspect has to be considered by the third respondent, including by inspecting the site.

5. Subject to the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 22.01.2026, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top