SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14303

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
S.Mariya Joseph – Appellant
Versus
The Government Of Puducherry – Respondent
W.P. No. 5369 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V. Rajesh Babu
For the Respondents: Mr.V.Vasanthakumar, Additional Government Pleader

The court directed the reconsideration of land acquisition compensation based on a prior award, emphasizing the statutory provision under the Land Acquisition Act.

Headnote:The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India requests the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to re-determine compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioner contends that a prior award set the compensation at Rs. 21,261/- per Are, which necessitated a re-assessment. The court directed that the respondents consider this application and issue orders within three months, ensuring a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. facts of land acquisition case under review. (Para 1)
2. respondent's acknowledgment of inquiry into petitioner's claim. (Para 2)
3. court directs action on petitioner's request for compensation review. (Para 3)

ORDER

The lands owned by the petitioner were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The compensation in respect thereof was also deposited. According to the petitioner, lands covered by the same notification were the subject of L.A.O.P.No.1 of 2017, wherein award dated 19.12.2024 was issued fixing the compensation at Rs.21,261/- per Are and other benefits such as solatium. Upon coming to know of the same, the petitioner states that he filed an application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act seeking re-determination in line with the compensation awarded in L.A.O.P.No.1 of 2017. The present writ petition relates thereto.

2. Mr.V.Vasanthakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for all the respondents. He submits that an inquiry was held in relation to the petitioner's application on 21.03.2025 and that orders would be issued within three months.

3. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act and pass orders thereon within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top