SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14360

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Mrs.L.Radhamani – Appellant
Versus
The District Magistrate-cum-District Collector, Chennai – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.K.Ganesh
For the Respondents: Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, GA for R1 and R2

The court emphasizes the mandatory duty of authorities to address representations under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 in a timely manner.

Headnote:This case involves the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s application in accordance with the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The court found that the representation was made timely and required an enquiry to be conducted without delay. The court did not comment on the merits of the case, focusing instead on procedural expediency.

Table of Content
1. writ for mandamus under article 226 (Para 1)
2. timing of representation and authority's duty (Para 2)
3. no comment on merits; procedural action mandated (Para 3)

ORDER

The writ petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 22.12.2025 to the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, within stipulated time fixed by this Court.

2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner it is submitted that even though the representation was made to the Collector, now it is made over to the competent authority, namely, the second respondent herein and the enquiry has to be conducted in the matter.

3. Considering the said submission made and the submissions of the learned Government Advocate that only now the petitioner has submitted the representation to the second respondent, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. In view of the innocuous relief that is granted, the writ petition is disposed of without notice to the 3rd respondent. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case of the petitioner. The second respondent shall take up the representation of the petitioner dated 22.12.2025 for enquiry and issue notice to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent and any other person interested in the matter, conduct the enquiry and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a web copy of the order, without waiting for the certificate copy of the order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top