SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14361

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
Dr.Ramya S – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P.No.7497 of 2026|W.M.P.No.8081 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Harish Bindumadhavan
For the Respondents:Mr.K.Tippusulthan for R1 Government Advocate, Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathick for R2

The court established the right of a person with disability to partake in selection processes under applicable laws despite initial application errors.

Headnote:This judgment addresses a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a Mandamus directing respondents to consider a Disability Certificate for participation in selection processes. The petitioner, a qualified doctor with locomotor disability, inadvertently applied under the incorrect category. The Court allows representation without commenting on merits. The final directive includes consideration of the representation on specified dates.

Table of Content
1. representation regarding disability in application (Para 2 , 3)
2. court's procedural directive on representation (Para 4)
3. disposal of writ petition without costs (Para 5)

O R D E R

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take into account her Disability Certificate and consequently allow her to participate in the Certificate Verification and Counselling under Persons with Disability Category for the Selection process conducted under Notification No.17/MRB/2025 dated 21.11.2025 and to allot a post accordingly.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a qualified Doctor who have completed MBBS (2015 – 2021) from the Tamil Nadu Dr.MGR Medical University and thereafter pursued Post Graduate Degree in M.D. (Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy) from Chengalpattu Medical College, Chengalpattu. The petitioner is a person with 40% Locomotor Disability due to Polio and she is entitled to the benefits of reservation under the Persons with Disabilities category. The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Surgeon (General) pursuant to the Notification No.17/MRB/2025 dated 21.11.2025 issued by the second respondent, however, the petitioner inadvertently, while applying for the said post, did not opt for the Persons with Disabilities category and hence the category is reflected as BC in the application and the petitioner is not able to participate in the Certificate Verification and Counselling under Persons with Disability Category. Hence, this Court may without going into the merits of the case, permit the petitioner to make representation to the respondents in this regard and issue direction to the respondents to consider the same and to pass appropriate orders on the same day.

4.Considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, permits the petitioner to make representation to the respondents on or before 25.02.2025. On receipt of the said representation, the respondents are directed to consider the same, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders, on 25.02.2025.

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri

5.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top