Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Anand Venkatesh, J
P.Vijaya Janarthanan – Appellant
Versus
Sri Devi Karumari Amman Thirai Arangam, represented by its Partners (i) R.Sudhakar (ii) Radhika (iii) K.Vaijiravelu (iv) K.Vengappa (v) K.Kumaravelu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for security and arbitration appointment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute and claim for compensation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. counsel's arguments and denial of claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's agreement for arbitration and appointment of arbitrator. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final order disposing the petition. (Para 10) |
COMMON ORDER
Arbitration Application No.6 of 2026 has been filed under Section
9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [for brevity 'the Act'] to direct the respondents to furnish security for the claim amount together with interest and on failure to attach the property owned by the respondents more fully described in the Judge’s summons pending adjudication of the disputes by the Arbitral Tribunal.
2. Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div) No.16 of 2026 has been filed under Section 11 of the Act for appointment of an Arbitrator to decide the dispute and differences between the petitioners and the respondents arising out of the lease deed dated 31.08.2022.
3. The case of the petitioners is that the respondents approached the petitioners and requested to take on lease the subject theatre premises. A lease agreement dated 31.08.2022 was entered into between the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
