Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
Integrated Service Point Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of arbitration petition under the act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. lack of response to trigger notice justifies petition (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. appointment of arbitrator (Para 5) |
ORDER
This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] to appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent in accordance with the Tender Document dated 17.11.2021 and Agreement dated 13.12.2021.
2. When the matter came up for hearing on 23.01.2026, this Court passed the following order:
“This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'] to appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent in accordance with the Tender Document dated 17.11.2021 and Agreement dated 13.12.2021.
2. The Agreement provides for referring the dispute for Arbitration under Clause 20 and the same is extracted hereunder:-
“20.ARBITRATION CLAUSE It is mutually agreed that in the case of any dispute arising out of any of the terms and conditions of this agreement including the interpretation of an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
