Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
Anthony Michael Lazarus – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Maple Foods – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the partnership deed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on the applicability of arbitration provisions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final ruling on the arbitration appointment. (Para 11) |
ORDER
This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [for brevity 'the Act'] for appointment of an Arbitrator to decide the dispute and differences between the petitioner and the respondents in terms of the Partnership Deed dated 05.07.2024.
2. When the matter came up for hearing on 18.11.2025, this Court passed the following order:
“This petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') to appoint an arbitrator to resolve the dispute arising out of the Partnership Deed dated 05.07.2024.
2. The Partnership Deed provides for referring the dispute for Arbitration under Clause 14 and the same is extracted hereunder:-
“14. In the case of dispute or differences of opinion between partners either on the interpretation of the terms of this deed or any of the partnership a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
