Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Sun TV Network Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Narayanan Ramasamy Sole Proprietor - Sri Thendral Films – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contempt petition for disobedience of undertaking. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observation on response and eviction. (Para 3) |
| 3. closure of the contempt petition. (Para 4) |
ORDER
This contempt petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the undertaking dated 07.03.2025 given by the respondent, which was recorded by this Court in its order dated 07.03.2025 passed in E.P. No.13 of 2024.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent/judgment debtor did not vacate the premises, based on his undertaking dated 07.03.2025, which is recorded by this Court in its order dated 07.03.2025 passed in E.P. No.13 of 2024, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition but the respondent was evicted by orders passed in E.P. No.109 of 2025 filed by the petitioner. Therefore, he would submit that the respondent will have to be punished.
3.Since the respondent has already vacated the premises though not as per the undertaking given by the respondent before this Court, which was recorded by this Court in its order dated 07.03.2025 passed in E.P. No.13 of 2024, the respondent having been evicted from the very same premises by the petitioner, the question of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
