Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
Shanmugaraj Murali Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Reddington (India) Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. brief facts of the case overview and conviction details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's argument against the conviction based on his position. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's consideration of the deposit condition. (Para 4) |
| 4. modification of the deposit amount and ruling. (Para 5 , 6) |
O R D E R
This criminal original petition has been filed by the petitioner/
accused seeking to modify the condition imposed by the II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai at Para 7 of the order dated 05.01.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.16 of 2026, directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.9,88,228/- (i.e) the 15% of 1/3rd of the cheque amount to the credit of S.T.C.No.863 of 2018 on the file of the Trial court.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
2.1 The respondent/complainant initiated proceedings under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short 'NI Act') against the petitioner/accused and other accused persons in S.T.C.No.863 of 2018 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, FTC-V, Saidapet, Chennai and the trial court, vide order dated 06.12.2025, found the petitioner and other accused persons guilty for the offence under Section 138 of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
