SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14436

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.Victoria Gowri, J
Rathinasami – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By the Commissioner of Police, Madurai Commissioner of Police Office, Madurai – Respondent
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.B.Chandramohan
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1 to R3)

Statutory authorities must address representations and cannot delay responses indefinitely, reinforcing the need for timely action.

Headnote:This petition was filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for direction to the respondents to conclude an enquiry concerning a representation made to the police. The court mandated that authorities must consider such representations diligently rather than indefinitely delaying their response. It directed that the merits of the matter be assessed, with a decision to be communicated within four weeks. The court maintained its neutrality regarding the case’s merits.

Table of Content
1. court seeks to enforce action on representations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. statutory duty to consider representations. (Para 3)
3. directs timely consideration of merits. (Para 4)
4. petition concluded with directives. (Para 5)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to conduct the enquiry and conclude the same within the time frame stipulated by this Court by considering the petitioner's representation dt. 05.02.2026.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had given a complaint / representation dated 05.02.2026 as against the fourth respondent before the third respondent police. However, the third respondent has not taken any action on his representation.

3. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

4. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2026, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner, as well as all other persons, who may be interested in the subject matter, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the respondents to consider the same on its own merits.

5. With the above observations and directions, the criminal original petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top