Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Velmurugan – Appellant
Versus
K.Saravanan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the judgment and case details. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the property dispute and the claims of the plaintiffs. (Para 2) |
| 3. the procedural posture of the case. (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments from the petitioners regarding claims of abuse of process. (Para 5) |
| 5. the court's perspective on the legitimacy of the respondents' actions. (Para 6) |
| 6. conclusion and the decision rendered by the court. (Para 7) |
COMMON ORDER
These civil revision petitions have been filed seeking rejection of plaint in O.S.No.99 and 100 of 2024 filed by the respective respondent.
2. According to the respondent/plaintiff in both suits, the suit property was purchased by them by a registered sale deed dated 28.12.2023 from the petitioners/defendants through their power agent Radhamani. It is the specific case of the plaintiffs that the petitioners/defendants were the original owners of the suit property and they executed a power of attorney in favour of Radhamani on 22.05.2023 and pursuant to the said power deed, she executed a sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs. Therefore, the petitioners/defendants cannot question the plaintiffs’ right over the suit property. Since the defendants
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
