SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14490

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
Dr.R.Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector / District Magistrate Cuddalore – Respondent
Writ Petition of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.S.Vasantharaman
For the Respondents: Mr.D.R.Arunkumar, Standing Counsel, for R3 to R5, Mr.S.Rajesh, G.A., for RR1, 2, 6 & 7

The District Court holds jurisdiction over disputes regarding compensation claims by landowners against telegraph authorities as per Section 16(3) of the Telegraph Act.

Headnote:The Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks to quash the respondent's order allowing the erection of high-tension electric transmission towers on the petitioner's land, citing compensation refusal. The court observed that the matter on this claim should be adjudicated in the District Court per Section 16(3) of the Telegraph Act. The Writ Petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to file in District Court for compensation claims.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to quash an order regarding property. (Para 1 , 2)
2. district court handles compensation claims. (Para 3)
3. writ dismissed; petitioner can approach district court. (Para 4)

ORDER

The petitioner seeks to quash the order passed by the first respondent dated 02.01.2025 and to direct the first respondent to forbear from erecting a high-tension electric transmission tower on the petitioner’s property.

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that high-tension electric transmission tower has already been erected. Therefore, the claim with regard to preventing the erection of the tower has become infructuous. However, the petitioner’s requests for compensation has also been turned down by virtue of the impugned order, which is challenged in this Writ Petition.

3. Having considered the provisions of Section 16(3) of the Telegraph Act and the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.380 of 2020, dated 18.02.2021, it is evident that the petitioner has to move the District Court. The power to adjudicate the disputes between the telegraph authority and the landowner, including claims for compensation, is vested in the District Court.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the District Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top