SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
Vijaya – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, Katpadi – 632 007. – Respondent
Writ Petitions



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.Abinu Monisha for Mr.A.V.Arun
For the Respondents: Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2

The court allows withdrawal of writ petitions under Article 226 where parties settle their disputes out of court.

Headnote:This judgment considers the withdrawal of writ petitions filed under Article 226 by the petitioners, who stated that the dispute was settled between the parties. The court accepted the withdrawal as per the letter dated 20.02.2026 from the petitioners and issued a dismissal without costs. The issue presented was whether the court would grant leave to withdraw the petitions. The court concluded that since the dispute was settled, the petitions were dismissed as withdrawn without costs, as articulated in the last sentence of the common order.

COMMON ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute has been settled by and between the private parties. Therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions. Letter dated 20.02.2026 has been submitted for this purpose. Therefore, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top