Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
S.Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
Palaniappan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to amendment order (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on amendment necessity (Para 6) |
| 3. court's observations on proper procedure (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. conditions for permissible amendment (Para 9) |
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri in I.A.No.4 of 2025 in O.S.No.146 of 2023, dated 17.04.2025 allowing the application for amendment of plaint filed by the respondent/plaintiff.
2. The respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.146 of 2023 for Specific Performance in respect of the property situated in Survey No.197/3.
3. The petitioner herein filed a written statement denying the execution of the agreement. The petitioner also raised a plea that the property was sub-divided and the respondent has not given the proper sub-division number.
4. The trial in the suit is already commenced and now, the suit stands in the stage of DW.1 cross. At this stage, the respondent filed the present application for amendment seeking to amend the plaint description by giving the sub-division number. By virtue of the amendment, the respondent seeks to substitute the original survey number mentioned in the de
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
