Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
Lourdhu Mary (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Stephen – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenging trial court order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding setting aside exparte order (Para 3) |
| 3. court observations on illness and setting aside exparte orders (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final ruling on dismissal of the petition (Para 8) |
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Virudhachalam in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.467 of 2023, dated 24.03.2025 allowing the application filed by the respondents 1 to 4 seeking to set aside the exparte order dated 15.03.2024 passed against them.
2. The petitioners 1 to 9/plaintiffs filed a suit for partition against the respondents. Owing to non-appearance of respondents, an exparte order was passed against them on 15.03.2024. Thereafter, the respondents filed the instant application on 04.12.2024 seeking to set aside the exparte order and the same was allowed by the Trial Court and aggrieved by the same, the petitioners have come before this Court.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the Trial Court has not given any acceptable reason to set aside the exparte order and therefore, the impugned order is liable to b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
