Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14993
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, R. SAKTHIVEL, JJ
Vairamani Sivakumar (Died) – Appellant
Versus
A.Palaniyappan – Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal | C.M.A.No.2940 of 2023
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.P.Neelavathi for Mr.T.S.Arthanareeswaran
For the Respondents: R1- No Appearance, Mr.P.Sankaranarayanan for R2
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.P.Neelavathi for Mr.T.S.Arthanareeswaran
For the Respondents: R1- No Appearance, Mr.P.Sankaranarayanan for R2
The court permitted the withdrawal of the appeal without assessing the merits, which is subject to the endorsement of the appellant's counsel.
Headnote:The judgment concerns a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appellants sought to enhance the award amount from an earlier order dated 14.06.2023 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal based on the counsel's endorsement. The court noted 'There shall be no order as to costs.'
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court allowed withdrawal of the appeal (Para 1) |
| 2. closure of appeal without costs order (Para 2) |
(Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
The learned counsel representing the counsel on record for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case file.
2. Recording the endorsement, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
