Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
Anitha Sankar – Appellant
Versus
K.Ganesan (dead) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought property details for decree execution. (Para 1 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. respondents argued against the necessity of a commissioner. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court emphasized the need for examining judgment debtors. (Para 6) |
| 4. court ordered the appointment of an advocate commissioner. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The decree holder is the revision petitioner, aggrieved by the dismissal of her application, seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for noting down the physical features of the suit scheduled property and collecting details about the tenants, portions occupied by the tenants, details of rents and advance paid by them and also to obtain copies of the rental agreements and file a report. The said application was resisted by the judgment debtors and the Executing Court by order dated 17.10.2025, dismissed the said Application, challenging the said order, the decree holder is before this Court by way of the present revision petition.
2. I have heard Mr.T.Sundar Rajan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Mrs.D.Prasanna, learned counsel appearing for the judgment debtors.
3. Mr.Sundar Rajan, learned counsel for the petitioner, would state that the petitioner had
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
