Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Nagaraj – Appellant
Versus
A/m.Madhava Perumal Thirukoil, (Represented by its Executive Officer having its Office at Temple Premises at Mylapore), Chennai - 600 004. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay and knowledge of orders (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's decision to dismiss due to false claims (Para 2 , 6 , 8) |
PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code , to set aside the order and decretal order of the X Assistant City Civil Court of Madras in E.A. No.09 of 2025 in E.P. No.1562 of 2016 in O.S. No.448 of 2008 dated 18.11.2025, is even otherwise illegal, incompetent and irregular.
For Petitioner : M/s.V.Srimathi For Respondents : Mr.D.Dirshath Raj for M/s.A.S.Kailasam and Associates **********
ORDER
The 5th defendant in OS.No.448 of 2008 is the revision petitioner, challenging the dismissal of an application filed in EA.No. 9 of 2025, dismissing Section 5 application seeking condonation of delay of 2779 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex- parte order dated 18.08.2017 in the Execution Petition.
2. I have heard Mrs.V. Srimathi, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Mr.D.Dirshath Raj for M/s. A.S. Kailasam and Associates, learned counsel for the first respondent/caveator. I have also gone through the records including the impugned order in the revision petition.
3. The learne
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
