SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 15022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
THE KAAVERY EDUCATIONAL TRUST – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
W.P.No.7446 of 2026 | W.M.P.No.8019 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kandhan Duraisami, N.Mathivanan
For the Respondents:Mr.B.Rabu Manohar, SCGC, Mr.E.Sundaram, Government Advocate, Mr.M.Sivavarthanan

Educational institutions can seek additional intake approvals without interim regulations, as established by applying the Doctrine of Necessity.

Headnote:The Writ Petition challenges the orders passed by respondent authorities regarding the increase of seats in the Bachelor of Physiotherapy course at the petitioner's college. The Court finds previous rulings have established that applications can be processed without mandatory regulations. The main issues addressed involve the applicability of the Doctrine of Necessity in educational admissions. The Court ultimately quashed the previous orders and directed the university to process the petitioner's application accordingly. No costs are ordered.

Table of Content
1. challenge to administrative orders regarding educational institution intake. (Para 1)
2. application of doctrine of necessity in processing educational approvals. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

O R D E R

The writ petition is filed for Certiorarified Mandamus, challenging the impugned orders passed by 1st respondent in No.Z/103/2024-AHS-DOHFW DEPARTMENT dated 09.12.2024, 2nd respondent dated 10.06.2025, 3rd respondent in Letter No. e5426/PME-2/2025-2 dated 26.06.2025, 4th respondent in Ref. No. 064981/PME/2/2025 dated 18.07.2025 and 5th respondent in R.c.Affln.III(2)/00366/2025 dated 10.01.2025 and R.C.No.Affln.V(5)/16234/2025 dated 13.06.2025 quash the same and directing the 5th respondent university to receive and process the application of the petitioner for increase of intake from 50 to 100 seats in the existing course viz, Bachelor of Physiotherapy in the petitioner’s College, The Kavery Physiotherapy College, M.Kalipatti, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District in line with order dated 19.01.2026 and made in W.P.No.49983 of 2025 without insisting on government order/no objection certificate/essentiality certificate from the Government of Tamil Nadu and grant continuance of provisional affiliation.

2. When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for both sides would submit that earlier the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.3213, 3277 & 3678 of 2025 and W.P.No.40016 of 2025 dated

02.12.2025 has already held that by invoking the doctrine of necessity in respect of the existing institutions, the request for starting new courses/additional institute can be considered in accordance with law notwithstanding the non-

framing of regulations.

3. Based on the same, several individual orders have also been passed by this Court. One such order passed by this Court in the earlier W.P.No.49983 of

2025 is extracted hereunder in toto for ready reference:-

“This Writ Petition is filed challenging a) the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent in No.Z/103/2024-AHS-DOHFW DEPARTMENT, dated 09.12.2024, F.No.Z/103/2024-AHS-DOHFW, FTS No.8309547, dated 10.06.2025; b) the impugned letter issued by the fifth respondent State Council dated 10.06.2025 and c) the impugned letter issued by the third respondent University in R.C.No.Affln.V(5)/16234/2025, dated 13.06.2025 and quash the same and direct the third respondent university to receive and process the application of the petitioner college for increase of intake of seats in the existing course in the petitioner college namely Bachelor of Physiotherapy from 50 to 100 seats for the Academic Year 2025-2026 without insisting on Government Order/No Objection Certificate/Essentiality Certificate from the Government of Tamil Nadu and grant continuance of provisional affiliation.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.3213, 3277 & 3678 of 2025 and W.P.No.40016 of 2025, dated 02.12.2025.

3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the University is not in a position to refute the same.

4. On a perusal of the impugned orders, it can be seen that, merely because the regulations have not been framed, the permission prayed for by the petitioner college has not been taken up and processed. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court vide judgment in W.A.Nos.3213, 3277 & 3678 of 2025 and W.P.No.40016 of 2025 dated 02.12.2025, has already decided the issue on hand. Useful reference can be made to paragraph Nos.36 and 37, wherein, the Division Bench has invoked the Doctrine of Necessity and directed the respondents to process the applications made by the existing institutions seeking additional intake in the existing course.

5. In view thereof, this Writ Petition stands allowed. The impugned order passed by the fourth respondent in No.Z/103/2024-AHS-DOHFW DEPARTMENT, dated 09.12.2024, F.No.Z/103/2024- AHS-DO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top