Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 15028
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
M.Velmurugan – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar, Registration Department, Virudhunagar District – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Bala Senthil Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, Additional Government Pleader
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Bala Senthil Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, Additional Government Pleader
A writ petition can be deemed infructuous when the relief sought has been granted or rendered unnecessary by subsequent actions.
Headnote:The petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Article 226, seeking a Mandamus for reflecting the revocation of an attachment order by the IT Officer in the encumbrance certificate concerning specific land parcels (S.No. 543/1, 561/1, 561/3, 561/4). The court notes that the respondents have already considered the prayer, rendering the petition infructuous. The matter was dismissed accordingly, with no costs imposed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition deemed unnecessary when relief sought is granted. (Para 1) |
| 2. the matter was dismissed as infructuous. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has now been considered by the respondents and hence, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
