SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 15030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Thangaraj – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District – Respondent
Writ Petition | Article 226



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.S.Sabbanikarburajothi
For the Respondents: Mrs.K.Malathi, Additional Government Pleader

The court mandates timely consideration of a pending representation under Article 226, emphasizing procedural compliance by authorities.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The Writ Petition is framed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, requesting a Writ of Mandamus. Facts of the Case: The petitioner seeks permission to cut dry and unproductive palm trees on his patta land, having submitted a prior representation on 10.02.2026 which remains pending.

Findings of Court:
The court directs the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation within a specified time.

Issues: The central question pertains to the consideration of the petitioner's representation for tree removal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes that the representation is to be addressed in accordance with the law within a time frame determined by the court's order.

Result: The Writ Petition is disposed of, with specific directives to the first respondent and no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks permission for tree removal. (Para 1)
2. court notes the need for timely consideration of representations. (Para 2 , 4)
3. pending representation requires court intervention for prompt action. (Para 3)
4. final order directs disposal of the petition without costs. (Para 5)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Thangaraj ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The District Forest Officer, Ramanathapuram Forest Range Division, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Executive Engineer, Agricultural Engineering Department, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026 seeking permission to cut and remove dry and unproductive palm trees in the petitioner's patta land comprised in Survey No.330/3B1 situated at Uraikinaru, Sayalgudi Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sabbanikarburajothi For Respondents : Mrs.K.Malathi, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026 seeking permission to cut and remove dry and unproductive palm trees in the petitioner's patta land comprised in Survey No.330/3B1 situated at Uraikinaru, Sayalgudi Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 2.By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already made an application to the respondents on 10.02.2026, with regard to the aforesaid prayer. Since the said representation is pending consideration, the petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition.

4.Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be considered by the respondents in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, by directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026 and pass orders within a period of four [4] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top