SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 15683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
S.Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
M.Raja Muthaiya – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA S.Sakthivel ..Petitioner Vs M.Raja Muthaiya ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem to dispose of the case in S.T.C.No.2167 of 2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai

ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed by the petitioner/de facto complainant seeking expeditious disposal of S.T.C.No.2167 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem, within a stipulated time.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

3. It is pertinent to state that a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267, has held that the constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other court. The relevant portion of the said decision for the sake of ready reference is reproduced below: "47.3. Constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending."

(emphasis supplied by this Court).

4. Considering the fact that the case is of the year 2025 and also considering the aforesaid decision of the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court finds no exceptional circumstance warranting issuance of a direction for a speedy disposal of the case in STC No.2167 of 2025. Therefore, the present Criminal Original Petitions stands dismissed. However, the learned Judicial Magistrate V, Salem, is directed to follow the mandate of Section 143(2) (3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

10-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No SRM To The Judicial Magistrate V, Salem.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

SRM

10-02-2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top