IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
G.KUBENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI G.Kubendran ..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Director General of Police, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 04.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri 635 001.
3. Venkatesh Prabhu ..Respondent(s)
Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to take necessary action against the 3rd respondent herein u/s.2 of Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 based on the petitioners representation dated
21.10.2024.
For Petitioner(s) : M/s.A.Jagadeeswari For Respondent(s) : Mr.P.Balathandayutham, SGP for R1 & R2 Mr.K.Venkateswaran for R3
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents herein to take necessary action against the 3rd respondent herein u/s.2 of Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 based on the petitioners representation dated
21.10.2024.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the occasion of Independence Day i.e., on 15.08.2024, the petitioner personally witnessed an incident at the entrance of Krishnagiri City Police Station, wherein the Inspector of Police Mr.Venkatesh Prabhu, the third respondent herein was sitting in a chair deliberately placing his foot with shoes on the Indian National Flag created out of Rangoli Powder on the ground, thereby insulting the sanctity and dignity of the National Flag. In order take disciplinary action against the aforesaid person, the petitioner herein made a representation dated 21.10.2024 to the respondents. However, no order was passed by the respondents as on date. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that pursuant to the complaint made by the petitioner, disciplinary action was initiated against the third respondent and punishment of deferred censure for three months was imposed.
4. Since the prayer sought in this writ petition has already been granted, nothing survives in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
10-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To:
1. The Director General of Police, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 04.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri 635 001.
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
VM
10-02-2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.