SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 15854

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D. Jagadish Chandira, J
NITHISHRAJ – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police – Respondent
Crl.O.P.No.2581 of 2026 | Crl.M.P.No.1725 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S. Saravana Kumar
For the Respondents: S. Santhosh

In instances of cross-complaints (case and counter), the court may direct the police to follow the procedure under Police Standing Orders (PSO 566) to investigate both cases and file a final report rather than quashing the FIR at the preliminary stage.

Headnote:The petitioners filed a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash an FIR registered for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324 & 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 4 of the TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the complainant's family with an iron rod and outraged the modesty of women. The petitioners contended that the FIR was a counterblast to a previous complaint filed by them against the complainant for similar offences. The court examined whether the FIR should be quashed in light of the existence of cross-complaints. The court observed that the matter is a "case of case and counter," and therefore, the appropriate course of action is to conduct a thorough investigation into both sets of allegations to determine the truth. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

Table of Content
1. allegations of assault and modesty outrage countered by claims of a counterblast fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. direction for joint investigation in cross-cases following police standing orders. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
PRAYER:

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to call for the records in connection with the First Information Report in Crime No.180 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.

O R D E R

The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.180 of 2025, pending on the file of the first respondent police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.09.2025, due to previous enmity, the accused abused the de facto complainant and his family members and assaulted them with an iron rod, causing injuries. It is further alleged that the accused outraged the modesty of the women in the de facto complainant’s family. Hence, based on the complaint lodged by the second respondent/de facto complainant, the aforesaid case in Crime No.180 of 2025 was registered on 12.09.2025 for the offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324 & 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of the TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 .

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are law students and that the de facto complainant and others misbehaved with the second petitioner and attempted to outrage her modesty. Therefore, a case is Crime No.178 of 2025 was registered for the offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 351(2) and 75 of the BNS. He further submitted that only as a counterblast to the petitioners’ complaint, the second respondent lodged a false complaint and that the first respondent police, without conducting a proper investigation, registered the present case. Hence, he prayed to quash the First Information Report as against the petitioners.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent police submitted that the present case in Crime No.180 of 2025 was registered after obtaining a statement from the second respondent, who was admitted as an inpatient in Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Hospital and that this is a case of case and counter.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. In view of the above, this Court, finding that this is a case of case and counter, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent police to follow the procedure contemplated under PSO 566 and conduct the investigation in both cases and file the final report within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top