SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 15909

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice T. VINOD KUMAR
Natesan – Appellant
Versus
District Treasury Officer – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.11028 of 2021 Natesan ..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1.District Treasury Officer, District Treasury Office, Thiruvallur.

2.The Assistant Treasury Officer, Sub-Treasury, Poonamallee 600 056 ..Respondent(s)

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent made in Na. Ka. En. 489/ A2/ 2020 dated on 20.11.2020 and quash the same and also direct the 1st respondent to not deduct the amount from his pension (PPO No. R0615051 DOR 30.11.2016)

For Petitioner(s): M/S SELVI GEORGE FOR Majestic Law Firm For Respondent(s): Mr.T. CHANDRASEKARAN SGP

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that while working as Grade-I Police Constable he had retired from services on 30.11.2016 on attaining the age of superannuation and his pensionary benefits have been settled in full.

3. It is the further case of the petitioner that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top