SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 15969

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
M/S. SREE SAKTHI VINAYAGA TEXTILE – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M/s. Sree Sakthi Vinayaga Textile Rep. by its Partner Mr.M.Baskar Son Of Murugasamy, Office At : No.54, Ponnammal Compound, Kannaki Street, Naikken Kadu Gobichettipalayam, Erode-638476.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO)

144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO)

Erode Electricity Distribution Circle, 132, Cutcheri Street, Gobichettipalayam, Erode 638 452.

3. The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO)

Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle, Door.No.33a-4, Siva Complex, Athani Road, Sathy, Erode 638 401. 4. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation snd Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO)

Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle, South 1, Door.No.30, Nirmala Theatre Road, Sathy, Erode 638 401.

5. The Assistant Electrical Engineer Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO)

Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle, South 1, Door.No.343, 154, Old Primary Health Center, D.G.Pudhur, Gobichettipalayam, Erode 638 503.

6. M/s. G.J. Spinners, Rep. By Its Managing Partner L.Baburaj Son Of T.V.Lazer, Residing at : Door.No.113, Panaiyampalli, Punjaipuliampatti, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode 638 459. ..Respondent(s)

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the 5th respondent to grant a fresh electricity service connection to the petitioner premises situated in New S.F.No.82/1C measuring to an extent of 1.73 acres situated in Thookanaickenpalayam, Senrayampalayam Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District, without insisting upon payment of dues incurred by the 6th respondent, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 05.07.2025.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Ramaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.I.Syed Sibghatulla Standing Counsel for R1 to R5

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to the 5th respondent to grant fresh electricity service connection to the petitioner's property without insisting upon payment of dues incurred by the 6th respondent, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 05.07.2025.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the property comprised in New SF.No.82/1C to an extent of 1.73 acres along with buildings situated in Senraymapalayam Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District was purchased by them in an e-auction conducted by Canara Bank. This property by mortgaged by the sixth respondent with the Canara Bank and due to default in repaying the amount, the loan amount was declared as Non Performing Asset and the property was brought to auction, and the petitioner is the successful buyer. The petitioner would plead that subsequent to his possession, there was no effective service connection in the said property and when enquired with the officials, they were informed that there was an arrear pending against the 6th respondent, the erstwhile owner of the property, to the tune of Rs,32,08,571/-. The officials had also informed the petitioner that unless the arrear amount is paid, no restoration or fresh connection would be provided. The petitioner was asked to pay the said arrear amount. The 6th respondent was also found guilty of tampering the electricity meter by altering the phase connection and this had been revealed in the inspection on 05.08.2014, which had resulted in under-

recording of 35% consumption and a demand was raised.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was neither in possession nor was a consumer at that relevant time, therefore, the petitioner cannot be burdened with liabilities for the wrongful acts of its purchaser. For no fault of their, the 5th respondent demanding the petitioner to settle the arrear dues and refusing to provide fresh service connection, is arbitrary and illegal. The petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top