##PAGE1##

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 30.01.2026

CORAM :

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025

V.Palanivel Rajan ... Petitioner

Vs.

V.N.Sandeep

The Regional Manager

The United India Insurance

Silingi Buildings,

No.134, Greams Road,

Thousand Lights West,

Chennai - 600 006.

rep. by the Authorised Officer ... Respondent

Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt

of Courts Act, 1971, to summon the contemnors herein and punish

his for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)

No.16414 of 2024 dated 22.07.2024.

For Petitioner : No Appearance

For Respondent : Mr.A.Shayakan

Standing Counsel

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 02:40:41 pm )

##PAGE2##

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court that the order of

this Court in WP.(MD)No.16414 of 2024 dated 22.07.2024, has not

been complied with.

2.The petitioner, claiming reimbursement of the medical

expenses incurred by his wife, has submitted a representation to

the respondent and the respondent herein by his order dated

03.05.2024 has rejected the same. As against the said order, the

petitioner has filed a writ petition in WP.(MD)No.16414 of 2024.

This Court by its order dated 22.07.2024, has disposed of the said

writ petition by setting aside the order dated 03.05.2024 and

directed the respondent to reconsider the claim of the petitioner.

Now,the petitioner has filed this contempt petition that the order

passed by this Court dated 22.07.2024 has not been complied with.

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 02:40:41 pm )

##PAGE3##

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025

3.When this contempt petition was taken up for hearing on

27.01.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner

and therefore the registry has listed this contempt petition today,

ie., 30.01.2026. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of

the petitioner.

4.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

respondent submits that the petitioner is claiming reimbursement

for the maternity expenses incurred for his wife. According to

him, as per the scheme, medical expenses incurred for maternity is

not entitled for reimbursement and the same is communicated to

the petitioner, vide letter dated 06.01.2026.

5.In view of the above submission, this contempt petition is

closed.

30.01.2026

NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes/No

Internet:Yes

gns

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 02:40:41 pm )

##PAGE4##

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025

To

The Regional Manager

The United India Insurance

Silingi Buildings,

No.134, Greams Road,

Thousand Lights West,

Chennai - 600 006.

4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 02:40:41 pm )

##PAGE5##

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025

B.PUGALENDHI,J

gns

Cont.P.(MD)No.3314 of 2025

30.01.2026

5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 02:40:41 pm )

Click Here to Read the rest of this document