IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
SAKTHIVEL – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep By The Inspector of Police – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Crl.O.P.No.1922 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.1922 of 2026
1. Sakthivel
2. Revthi ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The State of represented by,
The Inspector of Police,
Mangalamedu Police Station,
Perambalur District.
(Crime No.147 of 2021)
2. Prema ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the
records relating to C.C.No.224 of 2023 pending adjudication before the
Additional Mahila Court, Judicial Magistrate, Perambalur and quash the
same.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ragavan
For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh
Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 05:27:58 pm )
##PAGE2##Crl.O.P.No.1922 of 2026
O R D E R
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to
quash the proceedings pending against the petitioner in C.C.No.224 of 2023,
on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Perambalur.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.03.2021, due to
previous enmity, the accused abused the de facto complainant and her
daughter in filthy language, assaulted them with wooden logs and
threatened with dire consequences. Based on the complaint lodged by the
second respondent/de facto complainant, a case in Crime No.147 of 2021
was registered on 02.03.2021 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323,
324, 506(II) of IPC and Section 4 of the TN Prohibition of Harassment of
Women Act, 2002. After completion of the investigation, the final report
was filed before the Court concerned and the learned Magistrate took
cognizance of the same and numbered it as C.C.No.224 of 2023, which is
now sought to be quashed.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that
the de facto complainant and her family were the aggressors who picked up
a quarrel and in respect of the same incident, the first petitioner herein had
2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 05:27:58 pm )
##PAGE3##Crl.O.P.No.1922 of 2026
lodged a complaint against the second respondent herein and others. Based
on the said complaint, a case in Crime No.146 of 2021 was registered under
Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(II) of IPC. He further submitted that
only as counterblast to the petitioners’ complaint, the present case was
registered by the second respondent. He also submitted that proceeding with
the trial against the petitioners would amount to an abuse of process of law.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for
the first respondent submitted that this is a case of case and counter and that
in respect of the incident occurred on 01.03.2021, two First Information
Reports were registered. He further submitted that first respondent, after
completion of the investigation, filed final reports in both cases before the
same court, following PSO 566 and that in respect of the case in Crime
No.146 of 2021, cognizance was taken in C.C.No.69 of 2023. He also
submitted that as far as this case is concerned, the victim sustained injuries
and in respect thereof, the statement of the Doctor and the would certificate
are also available. He further submitted that both the cases are being tried on
different dates.
3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/02/2026 05:27:58 pm )
##PAGE4##Crl.O.P.No.1922 of 2026
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on
record.
6. It is pertinent to note the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court
in the case of Nathi Lal and other Vs State of U.P. and another reported in
1990 (Supp) SCC 145, the relevant portion of which is extracted
hereunder:-
“We think that the fair procedure to adopt in a
matter like the present where there are cross cases, is to
direct that the same learned judge must try both the
cross cases one after the other. After the recording of
evidence in one case is completed, he must hear the
arguments but he must reserve the judgment. Thereafter,
he must proceed to hear the cross
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.