IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice C. SARAVANAN
Kannippan Arumugan – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner ST – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.No.2943 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.01.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.No.2943 of 2026
and
W.M.P.Nos.3290 and 3291 of 2026
Mr.Kannippan Arumugan
Sole Proprietor of
Tvl. P A TRADERS
No.1A/2, Munniyappan Nagar Main Road,
Selliyamman Nagar Extn, Nerkunram
Chennai. ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Saligramam Assessment Circle,
Central 1, Chennai Central
No.307, 3rd Floor,
Mylapore Taluk office Building,
Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028. ... Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for
issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records and
seeking quash of the Impugned Order in Original vide GSTIN
33ACXPA8247L1Z3/2022-23, dated 21.07.2025 along with DRC-07
Ref.No.ZD330725212398B on the file of the Respondent, as it is arbitrary
and bad in law, with a consequential direction to the Respondent to permit
rectification of the inadvertent error in GSTR-1 and drop the proceedings.
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/02/2026 12:55:08 pm )
##PAGE2##W.P.No.2943 of 2026
For Petitioner : M/s.Jayalakshmi.P
For Respondent : M/s.K.Vasanthamala,
Government Advocate
***************
O R D E R
M/s.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice
for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission
itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the
learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order
dated 21.07.2025 in Form GST DRC-07 passed for the tax period 2022–
2023, whereby the demand proposed in the Show Cause Notice dated
30.05.2023 has been confirmed against the petitioner.
4. The impugned assessment order has been passed after
considering the petitioner’s reply to the aforesaid Show Cause Notice in
2/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/02/2026 12:55:08 pm )
##PAGE3##W.P.No.2943 of 2026
Form DRC-01 dated 30.05.2023. It is evident that the dispute arose on
account of a mistake committed by the petitioner in filing GSTR-01 for the
said tax period.
5. It appears that by mistake, instead of Rs.1,31,280.30/-, the
petitioner had mentioned Rs.2,54,040.30/- in the returns as the tax liability in
respect of the supply made to Tvl.Innoforge Pvt Ltd vide invoice
No.PAT/017/22-23 dated 24.03.2023.
6. This error may have facilitated the said recipient, namely M/s.
Innoforge Private Limited, to avail excess Input Tax Credit of Rs.1,22,760/-
(Rs.2,54,040.30 – Rs.1,31,280.30).
7. The records filed before this Court reveal that in Form GSTR-3B
filed by the petitioner, the petitioner has correctly determined the taxable
value of the petitioner as Rs. 14,58,670/- for the relevant tax period.
3/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/02/2026 12:55:08 pm )
##PAGE4##W.P.No.2943 of 2026
8. Ideally, the petitioner ought to have issued a sales return credit
note or rectified the mistake by filing a rectification application at the
appropriate time. However, the petitioner failed to do so and has acted only
after the issuance of the Show Cause Notice in Form DRC-01 dated
30.05.2023, which has now culminated in the impugned order dated
21.07.2025.
9. Even if the credit was availed by M/s. Innoforge Private Limited
on the strength of auto-populated GSTR-2A/2B, it would amount to excess
Input Tax Credit having been availed by the said recipient. It is further
noticed that the petitioner has not obtained any certificate from M/s.
Innoforge Private Limited clarifying this aspect.
10. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
M/s. Innoforge Private Limited is not cooperating with the petitioner and has
not issued the certificate duly certified by a Chartered Accountant stating
whether the Input Tax Credit was availed based on the tax amount mentioned
in the invoice dated 24.03.2023. This, according to the petitioner, is a private
dispute between the petitioner and M/s. Innoforge Private Limited.
4/7
https://www.mhc.t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.