MADRAS HIGH COURT
*M. Sundar, K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, JJ.
Sathishkumar S. v. Commissioner Salem Corporation Salem
W. P. No. 5075 of 2025
1. When the captioned 'Writ Petitions' (hereinafter 'WPs' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity) were taken up, Mr. A. Mukesh, learned counsel representing counsel on record for writ petitioners was before us.
2. Mr. A. Mukesh, learned counsel for writ petitioners submitted that the captioned WPs arc covered by earlier order made by this Court being common order dated 12.02.2025 in W.P.Nos.4486, 4489 and 4493 of 2025 and writ miscellaneous petitions thereat (hereinafter 'Naveen Kumar order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity).
3. Issue notice.
4. Ms. N. Devi, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for both respondents and fairly submits that captioned WPs are directly and squarely covered by Naveen Kumar order. To be noted, a scanned reproduction of Naveen Kumar order is as follows:
5. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WPs stand dismissed in the same manner as Naveen Kumar order which has been reproduced supra. Consequently, captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petitions thereat are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Petition Dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.