SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 10738

MADRAS HIGH COURT
*M. Sundar, K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, JJ.
Sathishkumar S. v. Commissioner Salem Corporation Salem
W. P. No. 5075 of 2025



1. When the captioned 'Writ Petitions' (hereinafter 'WPs' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity) were taken up, Mr. A. Mukesh, learned counsel representing counsel on record for writ petitioners was before us.

2. Mr. A. Mukesh, learned counsel for writ petitioners submitted that the captioned WPs arc covered by earlier order made by this Court being common order dated 12.02.2025 in W.P.Nos.4486, 4489 and 4493 of 2025 and writ miscellaneous petitions thereat (hereinafter 'Naveen Kumar order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity).

3. Issue notice.

4. Ms. N. Devi, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for both respondents and fairly submits that captioned WPs are directly and squarely covered by Naveen Kumar order. To be noted, a scanned reproduction of Naveen Kumar order is as follows:

5. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WPs stand dismissed in the same manner as Naveen Kumar order which has been reproduced supra. Consequently, captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petitions thereat are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Petition Dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top