Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
Kannan @ Madankumar @ Umai Kannan – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Cheyyur Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging judgment and introduction of the case. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presenting eyewitness reliability and procedural discrepancies. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's evaluation of corroborative evidence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
(delivered by M.Jothiraman, J.)
Challenging the judgment dated 07.08.2019 passed in S.C.No.183 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Chengalpattu, the appellant/accused has preferred the above appeal.
2. The brief case of the prosecution is as follows:
2.1 PW1—Sakthidoss, who is the son of the deceased Chinnappan, deposed that he knew the appellant/accused; on 21.07.2009 around 8.45 p.m. he and his father were returning from Chennai after visiting his brother; since his father is a priest in the temple, they purchased provision material for the temple and returning to their home; he was on the phone, while following his father; near Cheyyur–Pavunjur road in front of Manivannan land, he (PW1) saw the appellant/accused quarreling with his father, during which, the appellant/accused assaulted his father on his right side ear using palmyra stalk (M.O.1); when the same
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
