Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. C.V.Karthikeyan, Mr. K.Kumaresh Babu, JJ
The Official Assignee High Court, Chennai – 600 104 Representing the Estate of Arjunlal Sunderdas (Insolvent) – Appellant
Versus
B.V.Reddy Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the civil suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of property transactions and agreements. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. cancellation agreements and their implications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's findings on property ownership and disputes. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. arguments regarding the status of agreements. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 41) |
| 6. key points considered for judgment. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 7. details of conclusion regarding expiry of agreements. (Para 76 , 79 , 86) |
| 8. conclusion and orders issued for applications. (Para 95 , 96 , 97 , 98) |
JUDGMENT
The 5th defendant, the Official Assignee, High Court, Madras, who had been impleaded subsequent to the institution of the suit in C.S.No. 285 of 2014, aggrieved by the Judgment dated 01.09.2023, is the appellant herein.
2. The suit in C.S.No. 285 of 2014 had been filed by the first respondent B.V.Reddy Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., seeking specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 13.12.2006 against the first and second defendants through their power agents the third and fourth defendants within the time stipulated by this Court, failing which to direct an Officer of the Court to perform the same and also to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
