SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16473

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, N.SENTHILKUMAR, JJ
Sudalaikannu – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons O/o. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services Madurai Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus New Jail Road, Madurai – Respondent
W.P.Crl.(MD) No.1196 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.SMA.Jinnah
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

The court held that emergency leave can be granted to a convict under extraordinary circumstances, despite concurrent legal issues.

Headnote:This judgment assesses the legality of an order denying emergency leave to a convict prisoner. The court determines the necessity due to the convict's spouse's demise, balancing it against the severity of other charges against the convict. Ultimately, a modification of the order allows a five-day leave. The key issue raised was whether the application for leave was justifiable under court’s discretion in circumstances of family death. The court reasoned the urgent need for the convict to arrange care for minor children left behind, leading to a significant alteration in original decisions. The ruling is that five days of emergency leave was granted as specified.

Table of Content
1. emergency leave for convicts under family emergency. (Para 1 , 2)
2. final order for leave granted with conditions. (Para 4)

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P.Crl.(MD) No.1196 of 2026 Sudalaikannu ... Petitioner -vs-

1. The Deputy Inspector of General of Prisons O/o. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services Madurai Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus New Jail Road, Madurai

2. The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Madurai District 3. The Superintendent of Police O/o. The Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli

4. The Inspector of Police Kadayam Police Station, Tirunelveli District ..Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in NO.561//Tha.ku.2/2026 dated 19.02.2025 issued by the second respondent quash the same as illegal and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant emergency leave for the period of 15 days to the petitioner's brother who is convict prisoner namely Arumugam, S/o.Sudalaikannu,CP No.

1302 by considering the representation dated 02.02.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.SMA.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]

The prayer in the petition is to quash the impugned order passed by the second respondent in NO.561//Tha.ku.2/2026 dated 19.02.2025 and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant emergency leave for the period of 15 days to the petitioner's brother who is convict prisoner namely Arumugam, S/o.Sudalaikannu,CP No.1302 by considering the representation dated

02.02.2025.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that his brother was convicted in S.C.No.676 of 2017 and sentenced to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 376 of IPC by the Mahila Court, Tirunelveli . Aggrieved over the same, the convict has preferred an appeal before this Court in Crl.A(MD) No.240 of 2022 and the same is pending adjudication. While being so, the convict's wife died on 02.02.2026 by committing suicide leaving behind two children, therefore the brother of the convict submitted representation seeking one day emergency leave to perform the last rites for his deceased/wife and the same was also granted. Once again the petitioner submitted representation seeking 15 days emergency leave to look after the two children, however it was rejected on the ground that the convict is also facing trial in five cases including two cases for the offence under Section 302 of IPC, therefore the request of the petitioner was rightly rejected.

3. A perusal of the record reveals that the first child of the deceased was studying X standard and another child is also studying, therefore the convict has to arrange some funds for their educational purpose and also to arrange some shelter for them, therefore this Court is inclined to grant five days emergency leave to the convict with escort.

4. Accordingly, the impugned order passed by the second respondent is set aside and writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The respondents are directed to grant five days emergency leave with escort to the convict prisoner namely, Arumugam, S/o.Sudalaikannu,CP No.1302 from 02.03.2026 to 06.03.2026. The convict prisoner shall be released from the prison on 02.03.2026 at 6.00 am., (ii) He shall report back to the Superintendent of Prison, Central Jail,Madurai / second respondent, by

06.03.2026 at 6.00pm.., (iii) The petitioner shall produce all necessary documents, along with a copy of this order, before the jail authorities, (iv) During the leave period, the convict prisoner shall abide by all the conditions prescribed in the Jail Manual. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top