SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 16555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
N.Mani – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (Salem West) – Respondent



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.B. Keerthivasan for M/s.Law Vision
For the Respondents: Mr.U.Baranidharan, SGP

The court ruled that a Will does not require probate for property located outside Chennai, invalidating the refusal to register the gift settlement deed.

Headnote:The court analyzed Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which outlines exceptions for obtaining probate of a Will for properties outside Chennai. The petitioner sought to quash an impugned refusal check slip concerning a gift settlement deed. The court found that the refusal was not legally justified as probate was not required for the property in question, leading to the conclusion that the refusal check slip should be quashed. Consequently, the court ordered the registration of the gift settlement deed within four weeks, subject to compliance with requisite fees and conditions.

Table of Content
1. writ petition challenges registration refusal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. no probate required for property outside chennai. (Para 3)
3. court orders registration of gift settlement deed. (Para 4)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip dated 17.10.2025 issued by the second respondent refusing to register the gift settlement deed dated 16.10.2025 presented by the petitioner for registration, on the ground that the parent document, namely, Will has not been probated. The property in question is situated in Salem District.

2. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. Admittedly, there is no legal requirement for obtaining probate of the said Will. Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, also gives exceptions for grant of probate of a 'Will' for properties which are situated outside the city limits of Chennai. Therefore, since the property in question is situated in Salem District, the respondent cannot raise question about the probate of the Will. However, despite this settled legal position, the second respondent has refused to register the gift settlement deed dated 16.10.2025 presented by the petitioner for registration on the ground that Will requires probate. Therefore, since the impugned refusal check slip issued by the second respondent is not in accordance with the settled law, necessarily, the impugned order dated

17.10.2025 is liable to be quashed.

4. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 17.10.2025 is quashed and the writ petition is allowed by directing the second respondent to register the gift settlement deed dated 17.10.2025 presented by the petitioner for registration, if the same is otherwise in order, and the petitioner has paid the requisite stamp duty and registration fees as per the relevant statute/rules, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top