Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
SHANTHI @ Annakamu – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought cancellation of registration. (Para 1) |
| 2. court observes relief must be through civil court. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 3) |
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd Respondent vide his Proceedings No.O.Mu.No.5816/E3/2025 dated 03.11.2025 and quash the same as illegal arbitrary and violation to the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to conduct a detailed enquiry regarding the fraudulent registration of Document No.1104/2025 dated
24.04.2025 and to take appropriate action to remove the entry from the Encumbrance Certificate (Book1) as it was registered in violation of Section 23 of the Registration Act, 1908, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 18.10.2025.
For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Dinesh For Respondent(s): Ms.Aswini Devi K, AGP
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the court bundle seeking for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
